Read the Bills Act Coalition

Friday, February 3, 2012

The Contemporary Conservative - What is a Contemporary Conservative

Reposted from the archives 10/24/2007

Con•tem•po•rar•y Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[kuh n-tem-puh-rer-ee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation adjective, noun, plural -rar•ies.
–adjective
1. Existing, occurring, or living at the same time; belonging to the same time: Newton's discovery of the calculus was contemporary with that of Leibniz.
2. of the present time; modern

Con-serv-a-tis-m
–noun
1. A political or theological orientation advocating the preservation of the best in society and opposing radical changes
2. A political philosophy or attitude emphasizing respect for traditional institutions, distrust of government activism, and opposition to sudden change in the established order.

What is a contemporary conservative?
This is a question that each one of us should ask ourselves each morning in this ever changing world that seems to be quickly spiraling out of control.
The contemporary conservative is a person born post baby boom that grew up with various liberal ideas thrust upon them as stated fact in the media, public schools, government policy and the like. The contemporary conservative didn’t necessarily grow up with the conservative mindset, but came to it through study, observation and meditation on what is right in the long run for all people. The Contemporary Conservative was skeptical and rejected short sighted, easy “feel good” policies that only serve to boost the egos of those who propose them and not help those people in need. We contemporary conservatives tend to be pragmatic educated thinkers that see that the “common-sense” approach inherent in the principles of lower-taxes, managed spending, strong defense, securing the borders, strong local government are the most efficient ways to achieve what every American wants, freedom and the pursuit of happiness. We do not think that it is the job of the federal government is to take care of each citizen from cradle to grave…we are self-reliant and expect others to be so as well. With that being said, most contemporary conservatives understand that we should help those less fortunate and are not against programs that accomplish this in an effective way. Through acts of kindness, efficiently run government programs, and donations to those non-profit groups that do so much to help those around us we can assist those less fortunate but only if it gives them a hand up and not a hand out. The “Absolutes” in today’s society and strict ideological rhetoric don’t always work and can hinder progress on solving issues we all face. We, the contemporary conservative, believe the important work is to ensure that the solution implemented is fair, cost efficient and not duplicated else where no matter where it comes from.
We are first and foremost fiscal conservatives and all political ideology stems from this believe. Although we may be of a particular faith this may not be the driving force in our political viewpoints though God is always in our hearts, minds and souls.
The contemporary conservative understands that every program the government enacts is funded by our tax dollars and that the government should be more careful stewards of our money since they are representing their constituents with every vote they cast.
Contemporary conservatives view themselves as conservatives in the everlasting tradition of the Founding Fathers who put forth a set of political ideas, republicanisms, which all groups, even today’s extreme liberals, have made use of and not other more confusing terms as libertarian, right-wing, Republican or paleoconservatism.
I believe that the contemporary conservative is not inherently linked to any one political party, although I can’t fathom ever voting for a democrat politician, but to a philosophy summed up so eloquently by Edmund Burke ...“[I]t is to the property of the citizen, and not to the demands of the creditor of the state, that the first and original faith of civil society is pledged. The claim of the citizen is prior in time, paramount in title, superior in equity. The fortunes of individuals, whether possessed by acquisition or by descent or in virtue of a participation in the goods of some community, were no part of the creditor's security, expressed or implied...[T]he public, whether represented by a monarch or by a senate, can pledge nothing but the public estate; and it can have no public estate except in what it derives from a just and proportioned imposition upon the citizens at large”

Finally, we contemporary conservative have grown up with these false notions: that the 60’s were the only great time for social change in the US (not true, social change should be the USA’s middle name), that all corporations are run by lying, cheating, money hungry crooks (most are honest people trying to make a living), that the free enterprise system only help a few select individuals, the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer (the average income has risen for all Americans), that unions help workers, evolution is a fact (it’s a theory), that global warming is caused by humans and not a, that teachers are under paid, that the press only reports the facts, and that the government can tell us how best to live our lives (when in fact they work for us.) Any other myths you can think of? These myths and many more will be refuted, debated and put to rest on this blog.
Thanks

We the People...part 1 an Introduction

repost 08/20/2009 http://www.thecontemporaryconservative.blogspot.com/


I find it increasingly alarming that politicians of all creeds and parties (except a few state and local officials) are increasingly belligerent and resentful toward the constituents that they serve. As government continues to grow exponentially, a ruling class is beginning to take seed, despite the best effort of our Constitution to prevent such a thing. The preamble states “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence,[1] promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America” and introduces our constitution and establish government as a government of the people and for the people putting on solid footing that we (the people) are not to be ruled but are the ones that rule. Good or bad, the representative democracy that has been established in this country has allowed us to correct our faults, inspire those born less fortunate to succeed and blur the line of the caste system so prevalent in other countries ruled by dictators and aristocracy.
The ruling class, as well as, the evaporation of the middle class (the strength of America) is one of the major reasons that Socialism does not work when taken into the real world. In true socialism (or communism) all citizens are to be treated equal which in turn stifles the middle class to strive for a better life and keeps those in power with the affluence and influence that they and there families had when these policies first took effect. The socialistic “exception” or “exemption” for the ruling class whether it is a different pay scale, health care system (as the case with Congress and the current bill being proposed) housing or personal expression is why in the long run socialism cannot sustain itself. The innate need of the human to be self reliant and strive for a better life is born in all of us and for those that believe the government is the road to that better life are misguided or think that they will be protected when the government changes.
With every right we give away to a government to get something, we give that right away forever. Personal responsibility is a two sides sword that we must handle carefully since it all comes back to use in the end but is the key to the “pursuit” of happiness we, as Americans, hold so dear. When we begin to let a ruling class take hold in American we run the risk of elitists telling those they govern what is in their best interest as oppose to what those that voted them in state we need from them. When the party you affiliate with in power usually all is good (in most American’s mind) but when the opposing view is in rule all hell breaks out…..the problem is not so much the party in power is that we all have let the government grow unchecked in power so that a day will come when a bill will be passed suspending voting all together and we all loose. This is the main issue with a strong Federal government and weak state governments and is the reason why we should reassert the 10th Amendment (The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people) into actual practice and begin to reduce the Federal governments power. A dominant Federal government whether a dictatorship or elected one can, by it sheer size, impose its will on its people (good or bad) and then we cease to become a free society and become a socialistic or fascist society (two sides of the same coin) where we must do as we are told either because we are invested in that government for survival (e.g. welfare, socialized medicine, jobs) or by intimidation tactics that punish those who speak out against its rule. All governments are in the business of keeping themselves in business and the only way to keep them in check is for the people to rule the government and for that central government to be small enough that they are dependent on us and we not that we are dependent on them. As Jefferson once stated and has been repeated numerous times, “A Government Big Enough to Give You Everything You Want, is Strong Enough to Take Everything You Have.” …..more later on topic.

Rep. Allen West - "Obama, Reid, Pelosi, get the hell out of the USA"

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Greatest Line Ever Against Democrats LOL!!!

Patton

"A Time for Choosing" by Ronald Reagan

Donation up 100% for Susan G. Komen for the Cure

In the wake of this week’s announcement that Susan G. Komen for the Cure will no longer be awarding grants to Planned Parenthood, the breast cancer organization’s donations have gone up 100 percent in the last two days...On a Thursday conference call Nancy Brinker, the founder and CEO of the Komen Foundation, told reporters that the organization is “singularly focused” on combating breast cancer, and that the politics of the decision to stop funding Planned Parenthood has been distracting from their mission...Nevertheless, since cutting ties, Brinker announced that Komen’s donations have gone up in the last two days — by 100 percent....“Our donations are up 100 percent in the past two days. With all of the emotion around these issues — which we understand, we get emotional too, we do this every single day of our lives,” Brinker said, explaining that they do not make decisions to be popular, they make them to fight cancer....

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/02/after-cutting-ties-with-planned-parenthood-komen-donations-up-100-percent/#ixzz1lHyPBR9C

The Donald Endorses Mitt - The Fourth Sign of the Apocalypse

In the non event of the day, Donald endorsed Mitt for President...what does this endorsement really do for Romney? At least Trump is running for office anymore...

The campaign of Newt Gingrich suffered an awkward embarrassment Thursday after telling reporters sotto voce that Donald Trump planned to endorse the former House speaker, and then finding out that the real estate mogul and reality TV star had flown into Las Vegas the night before to back Mr. Gingrich’s arch rival, Mitt Romney.


Tuesday, January 31, 2012

NewsBusted

Romney wins Florida

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy